Home    Resource Store    Past Issues    Buyers' Guide    Career Center    Subscriptions    Advertising    E-Newsletter    Contact

Textile World Photo Galleries
November/December 2015 November/December 2015

View Issue  |

Subscribe Now  |


From Farm To Fabric: The Many Faces Of Cotton - The 74th Plenary Meeting of the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC)
12/06/2015 - 12/11/2015

Capstone Course On Nonwoven Product Development
12/07/2015 - 12/11/2015

2nd Morocco International Home Textiles & Homewares Fair
03/16/2016 - 03/19/2016

- more events -

- submit your event -

Printer Friendly
Full Site
Washington Outlook Archive
James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent

Industry, Importers Look At Future Trade

James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent

T extile and apparel importers and US manufacturers have taken a look at trade in the quota-free world of 2005, and to no one’s surprise, they see a picture vastly different from today. The projections were prepared by leading textile and apparel trade associations representing importers and manufacturers, in connection with a request from US Trade Representative (USTR) Robert Zoellick, who wants to assess the impact of the removal of all textile and apparel quotas by Jan. 1, 2005.

The American Textile Manufacturers Institute (ATMI) sees a world awash with imports from China that will have a severe negative impact not only on US manufacturers, but also on many of the 125 countries that have developed an exporting business as a result of the quota system that dates back to 1961.

ATMI believes a few countries, such as India, Pakistan and Vietnam; and those with free trade agreements or special preference programs, such as Mexico, the Caribbean and sub-Saharan Africa, will continue to be in the picture. That is because they enjoy tariff concessions, in addition to quota-free access to the US market.

ATMI says China already has demonstrated its ability to dominate markets — and to squeeze out other countries — when quotas were removed last year from some knit fabrics, luggage, brassieres and infants wear; and imports soared. The ATMI report notes that China today is the world’s largest exporter of textiles and apparel, and that the Chinese government has decreed textiles and apparel will remain a main export industry and employer. In addition, ATMI says, “the breadth and variety of China’s apparel production is unmatched in the world,” with Chinese apparel in the lowest-end and most price-conscious discount stores, as well as in the most prestigious, higher-priced specialty and department stores. Not surprisingly, importers of textiles and apparel see 2005 in an entirely different light.

The US Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel (USAITA) says that on Jan. 1, 2005, “ The distortion that has marked international trade in textiles and apparel for more than four decades, a comprehensive labyrinth of quantitative restriction, will finally end.” The association agrees there will be “significant shifts” in trade patterns that it says have been “artificially altered” in the past. It also agrees China inevitably will pick up more business as a result of the elimination of quotas, but it sees opportunities for other countries as well. USAITA believes retailers and other apparel importers will maintain business relationships with longtime trusted suppliers, particularly those suppliers that are vertically integrated and can provide a full package, from inputs to completed products. It notes that Korea, Taiwan, India and Pakistan fit that description.

The importers believe manufacturers that have developed less price-sensitive niche products also are likely to compete effectively, and they have opportunities throughout the Western Hemisphere as a result of duty and tariff preferences. They see a big plus in the fact that manufacturers in those areas are geographically closer to the US market and in a better position to provide just-in-time deliveries, shorter production cycles and better inventory control.

Kevin Burke, president, American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA), sees the 2005 elimination of quotas as “an extremely significant event for our industry.” He underscored the opportunities for sourcing apparel in Central America and the Caribbean Basin. Burke said many of his association’s members have considerable investments in Central America and the Caribbean in terms of both their own factories and relationships with local manufacturers. He said, however, the new era will present some major challenges, as apparel makers will have to find ways to work with some of the restrictions and conditions associated with the preferential trade agreements in those areas.

US Presses For More Trade With Africa
washingtonUSTR Robert Zoellick’s announced plans to expand and make permanent special trade concessions granted to sub-Saharan African nations under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) have raised the hackles of US textile manufacturers and may even create some problems within the African nations.

Thus far, 18 of the 38 countries in that area have been certified as eligible for the special trade concessions. When AGOA was pending in Congress in 2000, supporters of the US textile industry managed to obtain a yarn-forward rule of origin requiring that components be made in the participating countries. That was an attempt to avoid illegal transshipments from third countries. The act was to run until 2008. However, in a concession to some of the countries that had little or no textile production, Congress agreed to allow third country components up to specified levels until 2004. And that’s where the trouble begins.

At a recent meeting in Mauritius — attended by, among others, representatives of US companies that buy 90 percent of Africa’s apparel imports — Zoellick and Rep. William M. Thomas (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said they would take a look at new legislation that would extend the third country loophole beyond its 2004 expiration date and the act itself beyond its current September 2008 expiration. The US textile industry went ballistic, charging that a change in the third country rule would be a multibillion dollar gift to China, a major transhipper. African nations that have developed some textile manufacturing capability and are investing in more saw the proposal as something that undercuts their efforts. Zoellick said he was sensitive to these considerations, but emphasized that in general, AGOA has been a success, and “now it’s a question of expanding on that success.”

AGOA could end up being another classic textile trade battle.

Free Trade Agreements Proliferate
The US government has no less than five free-trade agreements in various stages of negotiation and implementation. The proposed free-trade pacts are with Chile, Central America, Singapore, Morocco, Australia and a group of five nations in the Southern African Customs Union. While all of the agreements involve a wide range of manufactured products, each will have some impact on textile trade. Since textile and apparel import quotas are due to expire Jan. 1, 2005, tariffs will be the only limiting factor on imports from major Asian manufacturers.

The US textile industry hopes each of the free-trade agreements will require products benefiting from duty-free trade to be made from the yarn stage forward in the free trade region, and that imports from third countries not be permitted. That would provide export markets for US yarn and fabric. US importers of apparel, on the other hand, will be pressing the US government to keep the free-trade agreements free of such restrictions, as they believe such restrictions undercut the effectiveness of trade agreements.

President Bush has notified Congress that he is ready to sign off on the Chile and Singapore agreements, so they could be implemented later this year, but the others are not likely to be wrapped up until well into 2004 or beyond.

March 2003