Campaign Seeks Relief From Chinese Imports
James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent
The United States Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel (USITA) says textile manufacturers are relying on public relations, not facts, in their effort to curb Chinese imports and the future threat they pose. USITA’s Executive Director, Laura Jones, charges that the textile coalition is “holding press conferences and parading congressmen and governors before the cameras — all smoke and mirrors — and not providing factual evidence that Chinese imports are disrupting markets and displacing American jobs.” She says that instead of seeking “more protection,” US textile manufacturers should be preparing for the day when all textile and apparel quotas will be a thing of the past. At that time, she says, apparel importers and retailers “can finally make their buying decisions like every other industry, focusing solely on which factories can deliver quality goods on time at the right price” instead of wrestling with a complicated system of quotas. She contends the removal of quotas will put “wasted money in the pockets of consumers.”
Even though an apparel import is an apparel import, US textile manufacturers realize some benefits from the special trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, the Caribbean Basin pact agreements and bilateral agreements that require apparel imports receiving special tariff and quota concessions to use fabric and yarn made in the participating countries. They see the pacts as a way to compete with Chinese imports.
In their appeals to the government, textile manufacturers and their supporters in Congress contend that competing with China is anything but fair. They say China manipulates its currency to realize as much as a 40-percent price advantage; subsidizes its manufacturers; is a major illegal transshipper; and can price its goods at any level in order to sell them because it has a state-controlled economy.
The initial thrust of the coalition’s efforts was aimed at getting the government to use the so-called safeguard mechanism in the United States/China bilateral agreement to reimpose quotas on imports of dressing gowns, brassieres, knit fabrics, and work gloves, which were decontrolled last year. Imports of those products have enjoyed double-digit growth since quotas were removed. The interagency Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements has asked for comments from interested parties to help it determine if the coalition’s petitions for relief are valid.
Textile Coalition Will Target 2004 Election Campaigns
Leaders of the textile trade coalition, recently joined by the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE), have made it clear they are going to do everything they can to make textile trade an issue in next year’s presidential and congressional election campaigns. In a series of meetings in the South and New York City, leaders of the coalition mobilized textile company executives for what they say will be a major grass roots campaign to call attention to the plight of the US industry and the need for government help.
The campaign will include voter registration drives to ensure that voters in textile communities will have an impact on the upcoming elections.
In addition, the coalition hopes to spark e-mail and letter-writing campaigns to Congress and the White House, underscoring the threat of textile trade with China. While the coalition does not plan to target any particular candidates, it will support those candidates who understand the textile trade issue and demonstrate a willingness to do something about it.
Although they have no particular candidates in mind at this time, there are some textile-area congressional seats that will receive special attention. The retirement of six-term Sen. Fritz Hollings (D-S.C.), a long-time supporter of the textile industry and its workers, will focus special attention on the campaign in South Carolina. National Republican election officials would love to see that seat swing into their camp. The contest for the seat of retiring Sen. Zell Miller (D-Ga.) will likely see the Bush administration’s textile trade policies on trial. Some of the other congressional seats in the textile belt could be heavily contested on the basis of the textile trade issue.
Although President Bush swept the South in his 2004 election, the heavy loss of textile jobs since he took office could become a major problem for him. Some textile industry leaders and their lobbyists have indicated the South may not be all that solid if Bush does not come through on his commitments to protect the interests of the textile industry (See “Coalition Seeks To Save Textile Jobs,” www.TextileWorld.com, September 2003).
During a series of textile coalition-sponsored news conferences, textile company and union officials were outspoken in their warnings to the Bush administration. Bruce Raynor, president of the 250,000-member UNITE, said, “It is unacceptable for countries like China that don’t respect basic human rights or environmental standards to flood our market, destroy entire industries and put hundreds of thousands of men and women out of work.”
Bruce Raynor, president of UNITE
Roger Chastain, CEO of Mount Vernon Mills, said, “I think the Bush administration can forget that the Solid South is solid any more, and he is running the risk of losing the next election.”
And Auggie Tantillo, Washington coordinator for the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, said, “Democrat or Republican …, we don’t care, the textile trade issue has to be the centerpiece of the discussions as we go into the election cycle.”