James M. Borneman, Editor In Chief
In a recent business commentary, the author pointed to innovation in the United States as a remedy for the flight of jobs to low-cost countries — with the finance and banking sectors holding the keys to the future of the US economy. In general, however, there is a sense that influencers of current policy have never spent a working day in the modern manufacturing environment, and simply dismiss it with a sense that manufacturing is both beneath them and simply unimportant to the future of the United States. This elitist attitude is disrespectful of the tremendous strides US manufacturers have made over the years in labor, workplace safety and environmental sensitivity, not to mention innovation in both product and process.
The language the anti-manufacturing choir chooses places anyone seeking fairness, enforcement and structural awareness (for example, of currency foolery) in the corner of antiquated, protectionist thinkers. This simply is not the case. Most manufacturers today are globally aware, heavily invested companies with interest in partnerships and global growth. However, systemic cheating undermines the ability of foreign and domestic manufacturers that play by the rules to forge these relationships based on sound business practices.
Globally, there are firms in every corner of the world worthy of the respect and admiration of their industrial peers. Very few US textile industry executives hold anything less than respect for these companies. It appears the responsibility for enforcement, however, doesn’t fall to the private sector — unfortunately, it’s the US government’s job. Even if a sense of competitive fairness is achieved through US policy, it is enforcement that makes it happen.
Any game can have good rules, but without a referee who is not afraid to blow the whistle, the game, its competitors and the outcome are not done justice. With that in mind, one wonders if the current administration has the fortitude to enforce the rules, or has it simply lost its whistle?