Building Better Apparel Brands
By tapping into the textile supply chain's technical experience, brands can find solutions to improve product quality.
James M. Borneman, Editor In Chief
Case in point: During a recent Textile World interview, David Sasso, vice president, sales, Jefferson, Ga-based Buhler Quality Yarns Corp., explained how a major U.S. retailer requested the technical experience of Buhler's staff to help investigate a quality issue with a house-branded garment.
Buhler was engaged in a program supplying high-end Supima ® cotton yarn to a well-known knitting and finishing operation in Honduras. The resultant women's top, however, did not meet the brand's expectations, notably regarding pilling and stability.
"This was an unusual situation," Sasso said. "We knew the yarn was up to specification and performing well in similar applications. We knew the knitter and finisher was a solid supplier. But the final product left room for improvement.
"What's really important is that the retailer knew us and knew we have expertise in the dyeing and finishing of garments made with Buhler yarns," Sasso continued. "For a number of years now, Victor Almeida has been with Buhler in technical service and sales and has brought additional depth to the team. Developing close relationships with retailers and brands means we work hard to make sure they know we bring more to the supply chain than a cone of yarn."
"We were able to go through the knitting and finishing processes and get another set or two of eyeballs on the product," Almeida said. "The knitter does a great job, and we really came together to save the program and perform for the retailer.
Left to right: Buhler Quality Yarns Corp.'s David Sasso and Victor Almeida worked with supply chain partners to correct a quality problem in a major retailer's house-branded garment.
"As it turns out, the problem was in the dyehouse," Almeida explained. "When the dyeing machine was being loaded, the rope of Supima fabric was shorter than the ropes of other fabrics being loaded into the same machine. So, during the dye cycle, the Supima rope was traveling through the jet some three times the distance as the other fabric, and really taking a beating. We simply equalized the length of the ropes running together in the dyeing process and the results were great. Overall, the garment's pilling was reduced and the product's stability was corrected."
"Everybody won," Sasso added. "The retailer knew the chain was delivering. Our relationship with the knitter was better than ever, and the product performed the way it was supposed to.
"I know this is a Buhler example, but I think it is broader than that," Sasso said. "I'm not convinced that the value of a collaborative supply chain is really understood. It is easy to undervalue. There is a tremendous wealth of information along the supply chain. You'd be surprised what logistics people know, what knitters and dyers know -- often about things upstream or downstream from their own operation. "
Not every supply chain is capable of performing in a collaborative way. It takes an openness and trust that is built over time. But, as with the Buhler case, the retailer was the key to success. With the retailer requesting participation, members of the chain were that much more willing and open to solving the brand's problem.
"It was a big win," Sasso said. "Both of our companies got that much closer to the retailer, and I think we demonstrated real value to them. And, hopefully, that will lead to that much more business. With a high-end product like this, if the retailer knows the full supply chain will perform -- knows that when problems come up, we'll get to the bottom of it quickly rather than pass the buck -- there is a confidence in the chain and a real competitive advantage."